Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 2 > Issue 1

Small States, Big Pork

William R. Hauk Jr., Economics Department, Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, USA, hauk@moore.sc.edu Romain Wacziarg, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, wacziarg@gsb.stanford.edu
 
Suggested Citation
William R. Hauk Jr. and Romain Wacziarg (2007), "Small States, Big Pork", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 2: No. 1, pp 95-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00005048

Published: 01 Mar 2007
© 2007 W.R. Hauk and R. Wacziarg
 
Subjects
Legislature,  Representation,  Democracy
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
Theory and Evidence on Legislative Malapportionment
Earmarks Data from the 2005 Highway Bill
Empirical Results
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References

Abstract

Using data on authorizations from the 2005 Highway Bill, we show that the legislative allocation of pork barrel spending by U.S. state (measured by the value of transportation earmarks per capita) greatly favors smaller states. We exploit the difference between two versions of the bill: the version that was passed by the House and the compromise version passed in conference committee. Our empirical results provide strong evidence in favor of theories of legislative malapportionment.

DOI:10.1561/100.00005048

Replication Data | 100.00005048_supp.zip (ZIP).

This file contains the data that is required to replicate the data on your own system.

DOI: 10.1561/100.00005048_supp