Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting > Vol 2 > Issue 1

Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment

Assaf Hamdani, The Hebrew University and ECGI, Israel, assaf.hamdani@mail.huji.ac.il Eugene Kandel, The Hebrew University, CEPR and ECGI, Israel, eukand@gmail.com Yevgeny Mugerman, The Hebrew University, Israel, mugi@huji.ac.il Yishay Yafeh, The Hebrew University, CEPR and ECGI, Israel, yishay.yafeh@huji.ac.il
 
Suggested Citation
Assaf Hamdani, Eugene Kandel, Yevgeny Mugerman and Yishay Yafeh (2017), "Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment", Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting: Vol. 2: No. 1, pp 49-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/108.00000015

Published: 06 Jun 2017
© 2017 A. Hamdani, E. Kandel, Y. Mugerman, and Y. Yafeh
 
Subjects
Financial Markets: Financial Intermediation
 
Keywords
Institutional InvestorsPension FundsIncentive FeesDefined Contribution
 

Article Help

Share

Login to download a free copy
In this article:
1. Introduction
2. Related Literature
3. Institutional Background, Data and Empirical Approach
4. Data and Results
5. Regulatory Solutions
6. Concluding Remarks
References

Abstract

Concerned with excessive risk-taking, regulators worldwide generally prohibit performance-based fees in pension funds. Presumably, competition can substitute for incentive pay in providing incentives for fund managers to serve their clients’ interests. Using a regulatory experiment from Israel, we compare the performance of three exogenously-given long-term savings schemes: Funds with performance-based fees, facing no competition; funds with assetsunder- management (AUM)-based fees and virtually no competition; and funds with AUM-based fees, operating in a competitive environment. Funds with performance-based fees exhibit the highest risk-adjusted returns without assuming more risk. Competitive pressure is not associated with similar outcomes, suggesting that incentives and competition are not substitutes in the retirement savings industry.

DOI:10.1561/108.00000015