Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 11 > Issue 1

The Mythical Swing Voter

Andrew Gelman, Columbia University, USA, gelman@stat.columbia.edu Sharad Goel, Stanford University, USA, scgoel@stanford.edu Douglas Rivers, Stanford University, USA, rivers@stanford.edu David Rothschild, Microsoft Research, USA, davidmr@microsoft.com
 
Suggested Citation
Andrew Gelman, Sharad Goel, Douglas Rivers and David Rothschild (2016), "The Mythical Swing Voter", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 11: No. 1, pp 103-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00015031

Published: 18 Apr 2016
© 2016 A. Gelman, S. Goel, D. Rivers and D. Rothschild
 
Subjects
Elections:Campaigns,  Elections:Voting behavior,  Public Opinion,  Bayesian Models
 
Keywords
Electionsswing votersmultilevel regression and poststratification
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
1. Introduction
2. Evidence from Empirical Studies
3. Discussion
A. Methods and Materials
References

Abstract

Most surveys conducted during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign showed large swings in support for the Democratic and Republican candidates, especially before and after the first presidential debate. Using a combination of traditional cross-sectional surveys, a unique panel survey (in terms of scale, frequency, and source), and a high response rate panel, we find that daily sample composition varied more in response to campaign events than did vote intentions. Multilevel regression and post-stratification (MRP) is used to correct for this selection bias. Demographic post-stratification, similar to that used in most academic and media polls, is inadequate, but the addition of attitudinal variables (party identification, ideological self-placement, and past vote) appears to make selection ignorable in our data. We conclude that vote swings in 2012 were mostly sample artifacts and that real swings were quite small. While this account is at odds with most contemporaneous analyses, it better corresponds with our understanding of partisan polarization in modern American politics.

DOI:10.1561/100.00015031

Replication Data | 100.00015031_supp.zip (ZIP).

This file contains the data that is required to replicate the data on your own system.

DOI: 10.1561/100.00015031_supp