Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 12 > Issue 4

Choice vs. Action: Candidate Ambiguity and Voter Decision Making

Yanna Krupnikov, Stony Brook University, USA, yanna.krupnikov@stonybrook.edu John Barry Ryan, Stony Brook University, USA, john.ryan@stonybrook.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Yanna Krupnikov and John Barry Ryan (2017), "Choice vs. Action: Candidate Ambiguity and Voter Decision Making", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 12: No. 4, pp 479-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00016051

Published: 07 Dec 2017
© 2017 Y. Krupnikov and J. B. Ryan
 
Subjects
Elections:Campaigns,  Elections:Voting behavior
 
Keywords
CampaignsVoting behavior
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
Ambiguity and Candidate Choice
An Impulsive Choice
Empirical Analysis
Voters and Candidates
The Stages of the Experiment
Hypotheses
Which Candidate Do Subjects Choose?
Expressing a Preference, but Not Paying to Vote
Replications
Conclusion
References

Abstract

A rich literature argues that electoral incentives lead candidates to take ambiguous positions on issues. Furthermore, empirical research suggests that ambiguity does not repel — and may actually attract — voters. This work, however, equates choosing a candidate with paying the costs of voting for that candidate. We reconsider the relationship between candidate ambiguity and candidate preference moving beyond candidate choice and considering turnout as well. Integrating political science with research on consumer decision-making and psychology, we argue that many who select an ambiguous candidate do not translate that choice into an actual vote for that candidate. We test this argument using three experiments which incorporate costly voting and other electoral conditions heretofore absent from research on ambiguity.

DOI:10.1561/100.00016051

Online Appendix | 100.00016051_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/100.00016051_app

Replication Data | 100.00016051_supp.zip (ZIP).

This file contains the data that is required to replicate the data on your own system.

DOI: 10.1561/100.00016051_supp