By Arthur Korteweg, University of Southern California, USA, firstname.lastname@example.org | Mark M. Westerfield, University of Washington, USA, email@example.com
We survey the literature on the private equity partnership arrangement from the perspective of an outside investor (limited partner). We examine how the partnership arrangement fits into a broader portfolio of investments, and we consider the methods and difficulties in performance measurement, both at the fund level and at the asset class level. We follow with a discussion of performance persistence and the skill and pricing power of both general and limited partners. We continue by examining the limited partner’s problem of managing commitments and investments over time while diversifying across funds in light of both idiosyncratic and systematic shocks. We close with a summary of recent work on optimal portfolio allocation to private equity. Throughout, we consider how empirical and theoretical work match the particular institutional details of private equity, and we identify 27 open questions to help guide private equity research forward.
Asset Allocation with Private Equity addresses the central question “What is the optimal portfolio allocation to private equity?” The authors have two goals. The first is to survey the literature on the private equity partnership arrangement from an investor’s perspective. The second is to articulate a list of open questions in the literature.
The monograph is organized to lead from a description of theoretical and empirical work toward open questions. To that end, a substantial number of recent and unpublished working papers are included in the monograph. It proceeds as follows: Section 2 contains institutional details regarding PE firms, funds, and investors. For some readers this will be a review, but it is included because the institutional details are required to understand the decision rights that the LP grants the GP and how those decisions are usually executed. There is a discussion of the GP’s incentives, which pervades the discussion of selected data and pricing power later in the monograph. To understand why the institutional details of PE matter for LPs, one has to understand the uses and limitations of the benchmark portfolio choice model. To this end, Section 3 reviews a standard portfolio choice model and shows how the characteristics of PE violate the model’s core assumptions. Section 4 describes the methods and problems with measuring performance in PE. Section 5 shifts the focus from PE investments to PE investors and examines the returns and pricing power of LPs. Section 6 focuses on LPs’ diversification problem and their liquidity management problem, including the role of the secondary market. The authors close with a summary of some recent work in optimal portfolio allocation to PE.