Journal of Historical Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 1

Arming the Enslaved: Different Paths Taken by the US and Confederate Congresses during the American Civil War

Jeffery A. Jenkins, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA, jenkinja@usc.edu , Nicholas G. Napolio, Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, USA, nicholas.napolio@ucr.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Jeffery A. Jenkins and Nicholas G. Napolio (2025), "Arming the Enslaved: Different Paths Taken by the US and Confederate Congresses during the American Civil War", Journal of Historical Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 1, pp 21-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000087

Publication Date: 19 May 2025
© 2025 J. A. Jenkins and N. G. Napolio
 
Subjects
Congress,  Political history,  Political parties,  War,  Voting
 
Keywords
UnionConfederacyCivil WarCongressarming the enslaved
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Republican Positions on Slavery Before and Early in the War 
A Shift on Slavery: The Confiscation Acts 
The Militia Act of 1862 
The Downstream Effects of the Militia Act of 1862 
Considering the Arming of Slaves in the Confederate Congress 
Confederate Senate Bill 129: Leaving the Door Open 
House Bill 367: Successfully Arming Slaves 
The Downstream Effects of Confederate House Bill 367 
Conclusions 
Acronyms 
References 

Abstract

This article traces the history of legislation to arm the enslaved in the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War. By the end of the war, both Congresses had passed legislation arming slaves, but the paths in the North and South were quite different. Differences in political institutions — namely differences in legislative organization, partisan control of committees and procedures, and party majorities — resulted in a quicker journey to arming slaves in the Union led by the legislative branch, and an ineffectually slow journey in the Confederacy stymied by the national legislature. The large Republican majorities in the US Congress — thanks largely to the absence of the Southern states and their Democratic legislators — greased the legislative wheels for action, whereas the slimmer majorities of former Democrats in a nonpartisan Confederate Congress led to sclerosis and a lack of decisive legislative action. In the end, Black federal troops fought in several key battles in the last years of the Civil War and were a positive factor in Union victory, whereas Black Confederate troops were never fully organized and did not see combat.

DOI:10.1561/115.00000087

Online Appendix | 115.00000087_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/115.00000087_app

Companion

Journal of Historical Political Economy, Volume 5, Issue 1 Special Issue: The Historical Political Economy of Race
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.