Journal of Historical Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 1

The Dog That Did Not Bark: The Failed Attempts to Disenfranchise African Americans in Early Twentieth Century Maryland

Thomas R. Gray, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, USA, thomas.gray1@utdallas.edu , Jeffery A. Jenkins, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA, jenkinja@usc.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Thomas R. Gray and Jeffery A. Jenkins (2025), "The Dog That Did Not Bark: The Failed Attempts to Disenfranchise African Americans in Early Twentieth Century Maryland", Journal of Historical Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 1, pp 139-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000091

Publication Date: 19 May 2025
© 2025 T. R. Gray and J. A. Jenkins
 
Subjects
Democracy,  Political history,  Representation,  Rule of law,  State politics
 
Keywords
Marylanddisenfranchisementballot reformsconstitutional referendumsAfrican Americans
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
The History 
Empirical Analysis 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

We examine the multiple attempts by the Maryland Democratic Party to disenfranchise African Americans between 1901 and 1911. The Democrats sought to disenfranchise African Americans because they were a vital part of the Republican Party, which had recently challenged Democratic electoral dominance in the state. These disenfranchisement attempts took two forms. First, the Democrats tried to manipulate the ballot in 1901 and 1904 to make it more difficult for African Americans to vote. Second, the Democrats tried to amend the state constitution on three different occasions — 1905, 1909, and 1911 — to make it more difficult for African Americans to vote. While the state legislature passed disenfranchising measures, a popular referendum was needed to complete the amendment process, and each time the voters of Maryland rejected it. After a thorough documentation of this history, we conduct an empirical analysis of all disenfranchising efforts. We first show that the ballot reforms initiated in 1901 brought about a significant drop in turnout and increased rolloff in down-ballot races. And in an analysis of the referendum results, we find evidence of a "racial threat" pattern of voting in which support for disenfranchisement increased in more diverse locations.

DOI:10.1561/115.00000091

Online Appendix | 115.00000091_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/115.00000091_app

Companion

Journal of Historical Political Economy, Volume 5, Issue 1 Special Issue: The Historical Political Economy of Race
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.