Journal of Historical Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 2

Governing the Gilded Age City: Local Institution Building in the United States

Mirya R. Holman, Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston, USA, mrholman@uh.edu , Lakshmi Iyer, Department of Economics and Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, USA, Christina Wolbrecht, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, USA
 
Suggested Citation
Mirya R. Holman, Lakshmi Iyer and Christina Wolbrecht (2025), "Governing the Gilded Age City: Local Institution Building in the United States", Journal of Historical Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 2, pp 215-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000094

Publication Date: 02 Sep 2025
© 2025 M. R. Holman, L. Iyer, and C. Wolbrecht
 
Subjects
American political development,  Democracy,  Government,  Political corruption,  Political history,  Public administration,  Representation,  Urban politics,  Leadership and governance
 
Keywords
American political developmenturbanpolitical machinesProgressive movementboards and commissionscivic engagementpolitical institutions
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Governing Gilded Age Cities 
The GGAC Database 
Context and Expectations 
Data on Political Regime Type 
Progressive Mayors and Appointed Boards 
Data on Civic Organizations 
Civic Organizations and Cultural Board Presence 
Discussion and Conclusion 
Acknowledgments 
References 

Abstract

Beginning in the late 1800s, dramatic population growth, immigration, economic instability, inequality, and industrialization created new policy demands that pushed local governments in the United States to expand their capacity. Appointed boards and commissions were an important tool for managing the complex challenges of cities during this transformative period but these are not well documented or analyzed. We introduce a new dataset of appointed boards and commissions across four major cities: Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Denver, CO; and Los Angeles, CA from the late 1800s to the 1940s. Supplementing these data with measures of local political regimes and organizational life, we demonstrate the utility of our new dataset through two applications: comparing the prevalence of boards (particularly civil service boards) under Progressive versus other urban regimes, and the relationship between local civic organizing and the presence of cultural boards.

DOI:10.1561/115.00000094

Online Appendix | 115.00000094_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/115.00000094_app