Journal of Forest Economics > Vol 13 > Issue 43526

Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods

Michael Christie, , Nick Hanley, Stephen Hynes
Suggested Citation
Michael Christie, Nick Hanley and Stephen Hynes (2007), "Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods", Journal of Forest Economics: Vol. 13: No. 43526, pp 75-102.

Publication Date: 06 Aug 2007
© 0 2007 Michael Christie, Nick Hanley, Stephen Hynes
JEL Codes:Q51Q26Q23
Choice modellingContingent behaviourForest recreation


Download article
In this article:
Improving facilities for forest recreation 
The survey instrument 


This research utilises two valuation techniques (a frequency-based choice experiment model and a contingent behaviour model) to value a range of improvements to recreational facilities in forest and woodlands in Great Britain. We provide the first comparison in the literature of welfare results from these two approaches. Four groups of forest users are targeted in this research: cyclists, horse riders, nature watchers and general forest visitors, and look also at “sub-groupings” within these classes of forest user. We found that heterogeneity of preferences exists within each of these groups. In particular, more specialist forest user groups attain generally higher values for improvements than general users. For example, downhill mountain bikers were willing to pay more for the provision of dedicated downhill courses than family cyclists for easy cycle trails. It is also argued that the use of a frequency-based choice task in the choice experiment has advantages over the more traditional choice tasks for applications such as forest recreation since a frequency-based task better reflects actual behaviour and encourages respondents to pay closer attention to the “distance travelled” attribute.