Journal of Forest Economics > Vol 32 > Issue 1

Reform and efficiency of state-owned forest enterprises in Northeast China as “social firms”

Xue Han, , Gregory E. Frey, , gregoryefrey@fs.fed.us Yude Geng, , Frederick W. Cubbage, , Zhaohui Zhang, ,
 
Suggested Citation
Xue Han, Gregory E. Frey, Yude Geng, Frederick W. Cubbage and Zhaohui Zhang (2018), "Reform and efficiency of state-owned forest enterprises in Northeast China as “social firms”", Journal of Forest Economics: Vol. 32: No. 1, pp 18-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.02.002

Published: 0/8/2018
© 0 2018 Xue Han, Gregory E. Frey, Yude Geng, Frederick W. Cubbage, Zhaohui Zhang
 
Subjects
 
Keywords
JEL Codes:C14 Semiparametric and Nonparametric MethodsGeneralC67 Input–Output ModelsL20 Firm Objectives, Organization, and BehaviorGeneralL25 Firm PerformanceSize, Diversification, and ScopeL32 Public EnterprisesPublic-Private Enterprises
Data envelopment analysisTechnical efficiencyState-owned forest enterpriseForest tenure reformSocial firmTobit panel model
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction
Background
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions

Abstract

State-owned forest enterprises (SOFEs) in northeast China have experienced past economic loss and environmental degradation, causing government to seek reforms. Measurement of technical efficiency allows us to evaluate overall trends and how reforms affect production of social and environmental goods. Previous assessments have used small samples, short time periods, and viewed SOFEs as if they were profit-maximizers. We compared a traditional profit-maximization framework to an alternative “social firms” framework for SOFEs to classify inputs and outputs, and data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of 86 SOFEs from 2003 to 2009. We argue that the social firm framework is more appropriate for SOFEs given their stated objectives. We found no overall trend in pure technical efficiency over time for the social firm framework; however, there was an increase in pure technical efficiency for the profit maximization framework, consistent with past literature. At the same time, there were decreases in scale efficiency primarily due to higher levels of government investment. We compared groups of SOFEs that underwent a specific pilot forest tenure reform to those that did not, and we found no evidence to support that tenure reform improved technical efficiency.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfe.2018.02.002