Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 13 > Issue 4

Democratic Reform and Opposition to Government Expenditure: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Britain

Jonathan Chapman, New York University Abu Dhabi, UAE, jchapman@nyu.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Jonathan Chapman (2018), "Democratic Reform and Opposition to Government Expenditure: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Britain", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 13: No. 4, pp 363-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00017024

Published: 30 Oct 2018
© 2018 J. Chapman
 
Subjects
Microeconometrics,  Public Economics:Public Goods,  Elections:Electoral institutions,  Comparative political economy,  Comparative politics,  Democratization,  Political economy,  Political history
 
Keywords
Democratizationgovernment spendingelections
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
Theory and Historical Background
Data
Empirical Approach
Results
Conclusion
References

Abstract

Several theories have argued that democratic reform will lead to higher government spending. However, these theories have generally focused on expenditure on redistribution rather than expenditure on public goods. This paper presents a model predicting that democratization leads to lower government expenditure on infrastructure if the median pre-reform voter is middle class. This prediction is tested using a new panel data set of town council infrastructure spending and revenue in nineteenth-century Britain. An 1894 national reform implementing a system of "one-household–one-vote" and the secret ballot is used as the treatment event in a difference-in-difference analysis. The results show that democratic reform led to lower levels of town council spending on public goods, including water supply and other public infrastructure, relative to towns that were democratized at an earlier date. In line with the theoretical prediction, this negative effect was strongest when democratic reform transferred power from the middle class to the poor.

DOI:10.1561/100.00017024