Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 15 > Issue 1

How Cross-Cutting Discussion Shapes Support for Ethnic Politics: Evidence from an Experiment in Lebanon

Laura Paler, University of Pittsburgh, USA, lpaler@pitt.edu Leslie Marshall, University of Pittsburgh, USA, lrm51@pitt.edu Sami Atallah, Lebanese Center for Policy Studies, Lebanon, sami.atallah@lcps-lebanon.org
 
Suggested Citation
Laura Paler, Leslie Marshall and Sami Atallah (2020), "How Cross-Cutting Discussion Shapes Support for Ethnic Politics: Evidence from an Experiment in Lebanon", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 15: No. 1, pp 33-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00018188

Published: 27 Jan 2020
© 2020 L. Paler, L. Marshall and S. Atallah
 
Subjects
Comparative politics,  Political economy,  Political participation,  Political psychology,  Public opinion,  Collective action
 
Keywords
Ethnic politicsLebanon
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Cross-Cutting Discussion and Support for Ethnic Politics
The Context: Political Crisis in Lebanon
Research Design
Main Results on Support for Sectarian Politics
Mechanism Results
Additional Analysis: The Role of Cooperation
Discussion of Results and External Validity
Conclusion
References

Abstract

It is widely believed that ethnic politics and conflict are less pronounced in countries with cross-cutting rather than reinforcing social cleavages. We argue that one possible explanation is that cross-cutting cleavages facilitate cross-cutting social interaction among individuals from different ethnic and/or class groups. This article examines whether such cross-cutting interaction, relative to homogeneous interaction, can reduce support for ethnic politics and increase support for a cross-ethnic, programmatic alternative. We conduct an experiment in Lebanon in which 720 lower- and upper-class Christians, Sunnis, and Shia were randomly assigned to participate in discussions that varied in their sectarian and class compositions. Our evidence suggests that cross-sectarian discussion resulted in less support for sectarian politics but only when individuals also belonged to the same economic class, driven by greater learning about shared preferences and reduced coethnic social pressure. We also demonstrate the limitations of other forms of cross-cutting discussion, showing that interaction among coethnics or non-coethnics from different classes did not weaken support for ethnic politics. These findings reveal when and how interaction that leverages a second dimension of interest or identity can help shift political preferences, shedding new light on the foundations of support for cross-ethnic politics in ethnically divided societies.

DOI:10.1561/100.00018188