Review of Corporate Finance > Vol 3 > Issue 4

Comparing Search-Engine Intensity and Regulatory Attention Impacts on Cryptocurrencies: Uncovering Important Heterogeneities

John W. Goodell, Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Akron, USA, johngoo@uakron.edu , Andrea Paltrinieri, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy, andrea.paltrinieri@unicatt.it , Stefano Piserà, Department of Economics, University of Genova, Italy, stefano.pisera@edu.unige.it
 
Suggested Citation
John W. Goodell, Andrea Paltrinieri and Stefano PiserĂ  (2023), "Comparing Search-Engine Intensity and Regulatory Attention Impacts on Cryptocurrencies: Uncovering Important Heterogeneities", Review of Corporate Finance: Vol. 3: No. 4, pp 571-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/114.00000051

Publication Date: 11 Sep 2023
© 2023 J. W. Goodell, A. Paltrinieri and S. Piserà
 
Subjects
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: G11, G15, G18, G19
BitcoinEthereumRippleLitecoincryptocurrenciesGoogle Trendsregulatory announcementsFED
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Background 
Data and Methodology 
Results 
Robustness Tests 
Conclusions 
References 

Abstract

Using search engine data from Google Trends alongside dates of US regulatory announcements, we comparatively investigate the nature of search-engine intensity and regulatory attention impacts on weekly volatility/returns of selected cryptocurrencies. Consistent with cryptocurrencies having an individual investor base, we find Google Trends volume is more impacting than regulatory announcements. However, while we evidence across cryptocurrencies a homogenous univariate and dynamic positive correlation between returns/volatilities and search engine intensity, we contrastingly find cryptocurrencies respond heterogeneously to regulatory announcements. Results indicate that Ethereum, and to a lesser extent Ripple and Litecoin, are important diversifiers to Bitcoin with respect to regulatory risk, with Bitcoin more vulnerable to regulatory shocks at lower (higher) levels of volatility (returns). Our findings should be of great interest to investors seeking ways to optimally include cryptocurrencies into portfolios, as well as to scholars interested more generally in distinctions with respect to market outcomes of investor sentiment versus regulatory sentiment.

DOI:10.1561/114.00000051

Companion

Review of Corporate Finance, Volume 3, Issue 4 Special Issue on Cryptocurrencies and Monetary Policy: Articles Overiew
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.