Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 14 > Issue 1

How Private Politics Alters Legislative Responsiveness

James N. Druckman, Northwestern University, USA, druckman@northwestern.edu Julia Valdes, University of California, USA, juliacvaldes@gmail.com
 
Suggested Citation
James N. Druckman and Julia Valdes (2019), "How Private Politics Alters Legislative Responsiveness", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 14: No. 1, pp 115-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00018066

Published: 11 Jan 2019
© 2019 J. N. Druckman and J. Valdes
 
Subjects
Legislatures:Lawmaking,  Campaigns,  Elections,  Interest groups,  Legislatures,  Political participation,  Public opinion,  Public policy,  Representation
 
Keywords
Private politicsrepresentationresponsivenesspolicy-makingstate legislatorsinterest groups
 

Article Help

Share

Download article
In this article:
Public versus Private Politics
Survey Experiment
Results
Conclusion
References

Abstract

Private politics occurs when citizens and activists seek policy change outside the democratic legislative process. This includes boycotting companies and/or buycotting products so as to influence market practices (e.g., increased wages, more attention to environmental impact). The rise of private politics complicates our understanding of democratic responsiveness — legislators may be less incentivized to respond to citizens' preferences. This occurs because legislators receive less credit for policy change and may view themselves as less necessary for policy-making. We present a survey experiment with state legislators to explore how legislators react to private politics. We find that a constituent communication that references private politics vitiates legislative responsiveness. In particular, Republicans become less likely to say they would take policy action or move their positions. Moreover, reference to private politics decreases the likelihood of constituent engagement among both Republican and Democratic legislators. Our results accentuate the importance of considering private politics in conversations about how democracies work.

DOI:10.1561/100.00018066