International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics > Vol 17 > Issue 1

Extended Producer Responsibility as a Driver of Firms' Ecodesign: A Systematic Literature Review and Critical Assessment

Filippo Corsini, Istituto di Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Italy, filippo.corsini@santannapisa.it , Marco Frey, Istituto di Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Italy
 
Suggested Citation
Filippo Corsini and Marco Frey (2023), "Extended Producer Responsibility as a Driver of Firms' Ecodesign: A Systematic Literature Review and Critical Assessment", International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics: Vol. 17: No. 1, pp 53-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/101.00000150

Publication Date: 13 Apr 2023
© 2023 F. Corsini and M. Frey
 
Subjects
Environmental economics,  Corporate strategy,  Electronics manufacturing,  New product and service design
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: M11F64D20K32
Extended producer responsibilityecodesignwaste electrical and electronic equipmentelectronics manufacturingWEEE Directive
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
1 Introduction 
2 Theoretical Background and Literature Review 
3 Methodology 
4 Results 
5 Discussion and Conclusions 
Appendix 1. Number of Sources (Academic Literature and Grey Literature) Mentioning the Barriers 
References 

Abstract

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is an environmental policy principle that intends at increasing sustainability in several sectors as it has ecodesign as one of its main goals. Nowadays, there is a wide consensus that the EPR principle is unable to achieve this aim; the different causes of this failure have been reported in several pieces of research but the big picture is still missing. This paper presents an analysis of the issues preventing EPR from being an effective regulative pressure for European electrical and electronic producers and stimulating ecodesign as a consequence. A systematic literature review approach, supported by qualitative text analysis, has been used for extracting relevant information from the literature, and a set of four propositions have been made to represent emerging concepts. Results suggest that the main shortcomings are related to European regulation and also to the supply chain structure and divergent interests of the actors. Conclusions provide suggestions on how EPR policies and business models may evolve to support a sustainable transition in this sector.

DOI:10.1561/101.00000150